The Australian published an article based on the letter, March, 14.
The Drum, ABC online, published it in full.
The letter is published in full below.
Open letter in response to the article: ‘Finkelstein report: Media’s great divide’ and editorial: ‘It depends who you talk to’ in the Weekend Australian, March 9–11.
Your coverage of the Finkelstein media inquiry report is a classic case of ‘shooting the messenger’. Instead of engaging with the message in chapter four of the report, which clearly outlines the emergency of public trust facing newspapers in Australia, you instead chose to focus on only one aspect of the report.
If the Australian public believe the current accountability system for the press in Australia to be satisfactory (self-regulation via the Australian Press Council), this inquiry would never have happened.
Judging from their submissions to the independent media inquiry, the newspaper owners and their associations believe there is nothing wrong with the status quo. Indeed, the vast majority of their submissions avoided any serious discussion of trust and accountability issues. This is remarkable for an industry with trust at the heart of its contract with the public.
The Finkelstein report is the first stage of a discussion we need to have about the future of media accountability in Australia. The ground is shifting fast in an environment where news media are expanding beyond their traditional markets into online broadcasting. The concept of different accountability systems for press and broadcast is outdated, as well as confusing for both the industry and the public. This is why we need an engaged conversation about the Finkelstein report and its recommendations, rather than the attack-style reporting displayed by the coverage in the Weekend Australian.
A statutory media regulator would be problematic, and this is acknowledged by many of those cited in your article. If you had contacted for comment all of those named in the story, a richer, more complex and hence truer picture would have emerged. The discussion is far from finished; the report from the convergence review is yet to come. We suggest that the most constructive way for News Limited and the other major newspaper owners in Australia to influence the outcome would be to engage in serious, constructive discussion about how to strengthen the independence and authority of the Australian Press Council. Had the media companies done this in their submissions, Ray Finkelstein QC might not have perceived such a pressing need to recommend a statutory News Media Council.
Journalism academics have been, and always will be, supporters of freedom of speech—the foundation for an independent and free media. To accuse journalism educators of anything less is an insult to an entire profession. However, we will not remain silent when unethical behaviour in certain sectors of the news media threatens the integrity of the whole. Part of our brief as both practitioners and researchers is to engage in public debate beyond the confines of industry and our universities. This is what we have done in our discussions about the Finkelstein report, and we will continue to do so.
Anne Dunn, University of Sydney
Alex Wake, RMIT University
Maree Curtis, RMIT University
Mandy Oakham, RMIT University
Margaret Simons, Melbourne University
Chris Nash, Monash University
Johan Lidberg, Monash University
Fay Anderson, Monash University
Mia Lindgren, Monash University
Alan Knight, UTS
Martin Hirst, Deakin University
Trevor Cullen, Edith Cowan University
Beate Josephi, Edith Cowan University
Rhonda Breit, University of Queensland
Michael Meadows, Griffith University
Lawrie Zion, La Trobe University
Julie Posetti, University of Canberra
Willa McDonald, Macquarie University
Roger Patching, Bond University
Gail Phillips, Murdoch University
Marcus O’Donnell, University of Wollongong
David Robie, Auckland University of Technology
Chris Scanlon, La Trobe University
Erdem Koç, La Trobe University
Rob Burgess, La Trobe University
David Lowden, La Trobe University
Steinar Ellingsen, La Trobe University
John Tebbutt, La Trobe University
Lee Duffield, Queensland University of Technology
Colleen Murrell, Deakin University
Tracy Sorensen, Charles Sturt University
Fiona Martin, University of Sydney
Ian Richards, University of South Australia
Amy Forbes, James Cook University
Andrew Dodd, Swinburne University
How should research into journalism be assessed in Australia?
In the July edition, 2017, of the Australian Journalism Review one section of the journal … Continue reading How should research into journalism be assessed in Australia?
The Senate inquiry: How governments can support public interest journalism
Drawing on the Journalism Education Research Association Australia’s submission (that I contributed to) I outline … Continue reading The Senate inquiry: How governments can support public interest journalism
‘A government without newspapers’ – why we should care about the cuts at Fairfax
Market based journalism is failing public interest journalism. It’s time for governments to consider how … Continue reading ‘A government without newspapers’ – why we should care about the cuts at Fairfax
Trump supporters playing with nationalistic fire
Has nationalism combined with xenophobia ever brought the world anything good? The answer is no. … Continue reading Trump supporters playing with nationalistic fire
Journalism in the era of post-truth and fake news
Confidence in the media has long been low, but can we really afford a society … Continue reading Journalism in the era of post-truth and fake news
New article – Suspect identified: revisiting naming practices in crime coverage
Australian Journalism Review – Vol 38 Issue 1 (Jul 2016) with Steve Lillebuen and Philip … Continue reading New article – Suspect identified: revisiting naming practices in crime coverage
New article: Information access evolution: assessing Freedom of Information reforms in Australia
Australian Journalism Review – Vol 38 Issue 1 (Jul 2016) The past seven years have … Continue reading New article: Information access evolution: assessing Freedom of Information reforms in Australia
Secrecy, Naru and Manus island
My take on our right to know what is done in our name in the … Continue reading Secrecy, Naru and Manus island
UniPollWatch: Monash journalism and 27 other unis cover the 2016 election
More than 100 Monash journalism student reporters contributed to the coverage of the recent marathon … Continue reading UniPollWatch: Monash journalism and 27 other unis cover the 2016 election
First Open Government Partnership National Action Plan for Australia
Monday April 11 saw a new chapter in Australian policy making. As part of Australia’s … Continue reading First Open Government Partnership National Action Plan for Australia
New book on journalism, secrecy and surveillance
As a result of the first Monash journalism research round table in 2014 myself and … Continue reading New book on journalism, secrecy and surveillance
Closing down FOI: a case study in sneaky government
My latest piece on the state of the federal freedom of information system is published … Continue reading Closing down FOI: a case study in sneaky government